Sudan Conflict: 9 Million Displaced by 2026

Listen to this article · 9 min listen

Key Takeaways

  • The Sudan conflict has internally displaced over 9 million people and created more than 2 million refugees across six neighboring countries as of early 2026, according to the UNHCR.
  • Regional instability stemming from the conflict threatens food security in the Horn of Africa, with Eritrea, Ethiopia, and South Sudan particularly vulnerable to increased cross-border movements and trade disruptions.
  • Humanitarian aid operations face severe challenges, including active hostilities, bureaucratic impediments, and underfunding, with only 35% of the 2025 UN humanitarian response plan for Sudan met by early 2026.
  • Neighboring countries like Chad and South Sudan, already grappling with their own economic and security issues, are struggling to absorb the influx of Sudanese refugees, exacerbating resource strain and inter-communal tensions.
  • Effective humanitarian response requires sustained international funding, guaranteed safe passage for aid workers, and diplomatic pressure to ensure compliance with international humanitarian law by all parties to the conflict.

The dusty road leading out of El Geneina, West Darfur, had become a lifeline for Hawa Ibrahim, a 42-year-old mother of five. In April 2023, when the fighting erupted in Khartoum and quickly spread, Hawa’s life, like millions of others, shattered. Her small shop, once a bustling hub for local goods, was looted, her home destroyed. With her youngest child barely two years old, Hawa made the agonizing decision to flee. She joined a stream of desperate families, walking for days under the scorching sun, carrying what little they could salvage, all while the Sudan conflict raged behind them. Their destination: Adré, just across the border in Chad, a place she hoped offered safety, but whose resources were already stretched thin. Her story is not unique. It’s a stark illustration of the deep regional instability and dire need for humanitarian aid that defines the crisis today. The scale of displacement is staggering. As of early 2026, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) reports that over 9 million people have been internally displaced within Sudan, with more than 2 million seeking refuge in neighboring countries. This exodus has put immense pressure on nations already facing their own internal challenges. Chad, for instance, has received over 600,000 Sudanese refugees since the conflict began, predominantly in its eastern regions. These areas, like Ouaddai Province where Adré is located, are among the poorest in Chad, characterized by arid field and limited infrastructure. The sudden influx has pushed local services past their breaking point, creating competition for scarce water, food, and shelter. Dr. Amina Diallo, a regional analyst specializing in the Horn of Africa, emphasizes the ripple effect. “What happens in Sudan doesn’t stay in Sudan,” she warns. “The sheer number of people moving across borders creates a humanitarian catastrophe, but it also destabilizes fragile political balances and strains economies that can ill afford it.” She points to the escalating food insecurity across the region, a direct consequence of disrupted trade routes and agricultural production within Sudan, once a significant supplier of certain foodstuffs. The Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) projected in late 2025 that large areas of Sudan, particularly Darfur and Kordofan, would face Emergency (IPC Phase 4) levels of food insecurity, with a credible risk of famine in some localities. This assessment considers both the direct impact of conflict on harvests and the inability of humanitarian agencies to reach those in need. Hawa and her children eventually reached a makeshift camp near Adré. The relief of escaping the immediate danger was quickly replaced by the harsh realities of camp life. Food rations were inconsistent, medical care almost non-existent, and the constant threat of disease loomed. Her youngest developed a persistent cough, and Hawa spent sleepless nights worrying about fever, a common killer in such conditions. “We escaped the bullets, but here we fight hunger and sickness,” she recounted through an interpreter, her voice hollow. Her experience highlights the critical gaps in humanitarian response. The challenges for aid organizations are multi-faceted. Access remains a primary obstacle. Active hostilities, particularly in Darfur and Khartoum, routinely prevent humanitarian convoys from reaching affected populations. Bureaucratic impediments from various authorities, including delays in visa approvals for aid workers and restrictions on the movement of supplies, further complicate efforts. According to a report by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) in early 2026, over 40% of planned aid deliveries within Sudan were either delayed or denied access in the last quarter of 2025. This denial of access directly correlates with increased suffering and mortality rates among civilians. Funding is another persistent issue. The United Nations’ 2025 Humanitarian Response Plan for Sudan requested $2.7 billion but had only received approximately 35% of that by early 2026, a significant shortfall that directly impacts the ability of agencies to scale up operations. This underfunding forces difficult choices, often leading to cuts in essential services like food distribution, health clinics, or educational programs for displaced children. “The world’s attention often shifts, but the suffering doesn’t,” notes a senior aid worker with Doctors Without Borders (MSF) operating in eastern Chad, who requested anonymity due to security concerns. “We see the consequences of this funding gap every single day, in every malnourished child and every untreated injury.” The regional impact extends beyond Chad. South Sudan, which gained independence from Sudan in 2011, has seen over 500,000 returnees and refugees cross its borders since April 2023. This influx places immense strain on a country already struggling with its own internal conflicts, food insecurity, and underdeveloped infrastructure. Many of these individuals are South Sudanese who had been living in Sudan for years, now returning to an unfamiliar homeland with limited resources. In places like Renk in Upper Nile State, transit centers are overflowing, and the local population struggles to share what little they have. This situation risks reigniting inter-communal tensions over resources, a dangerous prospect in a region prone to such conflicts. Eritrea and Ethiopia, while not receiving as many direct refugees, face indirect impacts. Trade routes through Sudan are vital for some Ethiopian goods, and their disruption affects local economies. Eritrea, with its tightly controlled borders, manages the flow of people differently, but the regional instability remains a concern for its own national security. The potential for the conflict to spill over, fueling existing grievances or providing fertile ground for extremist groups, is a constant worry for regional governments and international observers alike. From Hawa’s perspective, these macro-level concerns translate into daily struggles. The camp where she lives faces water shortages, and fetching water often means a long, dangerous walk. Her children, once bright and eager for school, now spend their days idle, their education interrupted indefinitely. The psychological toll of displacement, the trauma of witnessing violence, and the uncertainty of the future weigh heavily on her and her family. There are no easy answers for Hawa, or for the millions like her. The international community’s response has been criticized for its inconsistency and lack of urgency. While some donor conferences have secured pledges, the actual disbursement of funds often lags, and the political will to exert sustained pressure on the warring factions in Sudan to adhere to ceasefires and allow humanitarian access remains inconsistent. Without guaranteed safe passage for aid workers and a significant increase in financial support, the humanitarian crisis will only deepen, and the regional instability will continue to fester. This isn’t a situation where we can simply wait for an ideal resolution. Immediate, practical steps are imperative to save lives and prevent further regional degradation. For Hawa, the future is uncertain. Her hope lies in peace returning to Sudan, allowing her to rebuild her life. But even if the guns fall silent tomorrow, the scars of this conflict, both physical and psychological, will remain for years. The international community, aid organizations, and regional governments face a monumental task in addressing the immediate needs and laying the groundwork for long-term recovery and stability.

What are the primary causes of the current Sudan conflict?

The current conflict in Sudan primarily stems from a power struggle between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), led by General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a powerful paramilitary group led by General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (Hemedti). Tensions escalated following disagreements over the integration of the RSF into the regular army and the timeline for transitioning to civilian rule after the 2021 military coup.

Which countries are most affected by the influx of Sudanese refugees?

Chad, South Sudan, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the Central African Republic are the primary countries receiving large numbers of Sudanese refugees. Chad and South Sudan, in particular, have seen hundreds of thousands of arrivals, placing immense strain on their already limited resources and infrastructure.

What are the main challenges for humanitarian aid delivery in Sudan?

Humanitarian aid delivery in Sudan faces significant challenges including active fighting and insecurity in many areas, bureaucratic impediments such as permit delays and restrictions on movement, looting of aid supplies, and severe underfunding of humanitarian response plans. These factors collectively prevent aid from reaching millions in need.

How does the Sudan conflict impact regional food security?

The Sudan conflict severely impacts regional food security by disrupting agricultural production within Sudan, a key food producer, and by hindering vital trade routes. This leads to increased food prices, reduced availability, and exacerbates existing food crises in neighboring countries, particularly in the Horn of Africa, where millions already face severe hunger.

What measures can improve the humanitarian response to the Sudan crisis?

Improving the humanitarian response requires several critical measures: sustained and increased international funding to meet the needs of displaced populations, guaranteed safe and unhindered access for humanitarian organizations to all affected areas, diplomatic pressure on all warring parties to adhere to international humanitarian law, and enhanced coordination among international agencies and host governments to optimize resource distribution.

Christina Moran

Senior Geopolitical Analyst M.A., International Relations, Georgetown University

Christina Moran is a Senior Geopolitical Analyst at the Global Insight Group, bringing 15 years of expertise in international security and emerging economies to the news field. She specializes in the intricate dynamics of power shifts in the Indo-Pacific region, providing incisive analysis on their global implications. Previously, she served as a lead researcher for the Asia-Pacific Policy Institute, where her seminal report, 'The Silent Ascent: China's Economic Corridors and Geopolitical Realignment,' garnered widespread international attention. Her work consistently offers deep dives into complex global challenges, making them accessible to a broad audience